Saturday, October 27, 2018

Caravan, or Invasion? That is the question.

First, I need to publicly admit I briefly flirted with those who call the mass of people headed toward our border, an Invading force. These people are mainly from Honduras, where, if any information gained on the internet can be trusted at all, there has been political unrest for at least a decade. Maybe longer. The US involvement there has been less than stellar:

"In contrast, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted in her autobiography “Hard Choices” that she used her power to stir the crisis into a favorable outcome for the U.S., even if it meant forgetting about democracy. “We strategized on a plan to restore order in Honduras and ensure that free and fair elections could be held quickly and legitimately, which would render the question of Zelaya moot,” she wrote in her book. The “free and fair” elections that Clinton envisioned included a media blackout and targeted assassinations of anti-coup leaders ahead of the polls. No international institutions monitored the elections."

Here's more from the same article:

In an interview in Buenos Aires over a year before her murder, Caceres pointed specifically to Clinton for her role in the coup, arguing that it highlighted the extent of North American “meddling” in Honduras and support for the ongoing crisis.
Former Clinton White House counsel Lanny Davis was involved in lobbying against the elected Honduran leader deposed in the military coup. Working for the Honduras branch of the equivalent of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Davis called on U.S. lawmakers to back the military removal of Zelaya.
While multiple world leaders were quick to condemn Zelaya's ouster and demand a return to democratic rule, Obama's White House refused to label the political crisis a military coup.

  I now wonder if these people are fleeing loss of jobs, food, money, stability. My underlying, fundamental, and frankly, life-long position on immigration has been, "Come on in!" -When properly vetted.
  I got caught up in the thoughtless mob mentality of Trump and his ilk. Now I see that my original position is based on reality and should be steadfastly held to and enacted.

 Yes, immigration policy is a mess, perhaps deliberately made so by the Establishment to foment unrest between Americans. Looks like they are succeeding, so far

.Honduran Democracy Still in Crisis 7 Years After Coup

Saturday, August 15, 2015

Have You Noticed...?

The chemical factory explosion in China is a tragedy and I don't intended here to make light of it, but, I've noticed that no name of the firm has been mentioned in any print or television story I've seen, and I've pretty much scoured the news for it. In China, that means it is a State Run facility.
Can you imagine the howling that would've ensued if it was an American chemical company where this happened? Can you imagine how our vaunted 'statesmen' would jump at the chance to say how greed and selfishness are at the heart of the horrible disaster and how the company's CEO etc., should be arrested?
Yet, since the world media is silent on who 'owns' that chemical plant, to me that means it's a state run facility, so that's obviously okay. No big deal.
Similar to the EPA's dumping toxic waste in a Colorado lake/river without the slightest peep from the media. No one will be brought before congress, no one will be fired, or reprimanded, or arrested. You see, since the government did it, that's okay. It's just a silly mix-up. No big deal.

I'm running for President. Sort of...

My - admitted rather long--and unpublished--Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:
The farce that Fox News presented to us as a ‘debate’ last week prodded me to come up with questions of my own that actually, perhaps desperately, need to be asked concerning the Presidency, or any public office for that matter. Since no one, neither moderator nor candidate seemed to have the ideas and/or principles I hold concerning proper government, I’ve decided to interview myself as a candidate.
Moderator:  Since we now face a crucial time in our nation’s history, it is imperative that an actual, serious, authentic debate occurs concerning our path to the future, so my first question is:
What is your political philosophy? How would you govern as President?
Me: Thank you. I hold that the proper and only purpose of government is to protect the individual rights of its citizens. The human soul is a sovereign entity. Individual rights are the bridge between ethics and politics. Our Founders knew, from studying history, the flaws of each form of government that had been tried, and they designed the checks and balances aimed at preventing those mistakes from happening here. Even democracy, they held, was a form of tyranny, as it always descends into chaos. They wrote the Constitution as a limit on government power, not as a restriction of what individuals can do with their lives.  Re, our Declaration’s ode to Individualism, ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’.
Moderator:  We are seeing burgeoning unrest here in America. What do you see as the problem of race relations?
Me: There are several factors for this unrest. First, a century of government encroachment in every area and facet of our lives, regardless of race, causes disruption of all kinds. My belief is that the various forms of welfare programs allegedly designed to ‘help’ have actually kept us from advancing in our lives and have been no benefit at all. One of my first acts as President will be to undertake the dismantling of all welfare programs. They should be phased out over a generation.
Moderator:   Do you favor minimum wage laws and do you support the current movement to raise it to $15 per hour?
Me: No. There should be no minimum wage laws. I would automatically rescind them upon entering office.  Honest economists know that these laws actually restrict young, inexperienced, people from entering the job market.
Moderator: Continuing then, in this vein, there’s some talk in congress of restricting and monitoring CEO pay. Are you in favor of this?
Me: Certainly not! Do you want your pay monitored by the government? It’s no one’s business what CEO’s make, number one, and it is the province of the Boards of Directors and shareholders of these companies to decide that. Not congress. I consider this idea profoundly unjust and immoral.
Moderator: Do you blame Wall Street and the banks for the housing debacle that occurred in 2008 and 2009?
Me: Only partially, and please listen carefully here. The real, fundamental blame belongs to government policy. The policies of easing restrictions on borrowing lead to people buying homes they could not afford .Yet ‘the market’ is blamed for erroneous policy that business was forced by law to abide by. Blaming capitalism for bad government policy is again, both unjust and immoral. Yet, businessmen are partially to blame due to the fact that very few, if any, stood and spoke out against these horrendous policies.
 Moderator:  Climate change is a very real danger to the world. What is your policy toward restricting our ‘carbon footprint’?
Me: It is most certainly not a ‘real danger’ and I resent the politicization of science to ‘prove’ some ‘fact’ or other. Fossil fuels are the life-blood of civilization and in no way should be restricted, but used even more than they are, as they have been an enormous benefit to the human race and are vital to human progress.
Moderator:  Both Left and Right are making attempts to undermine free speech. What is your position?
Me: As President, I swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution (and the Bill of Rights) from foreign and domestic challenge. I stand by that oath and favor no restriction whatever on the dissemination of ideas. Bad ideas can only be overcome with better ideas; therefore, open dialogue is crucial, fundamental actually, to human harmony and progress.
Moderator: Although there are many other issues and questions to discuss, I see that we are almost out of time. Do you have a closing statement you’d like to present to the people?
Me: Yes, I do. I love America and the promise it has for every individual, and for the world. I will never apologize for our exceptionalism, for our greatness. America was the first nation in history to subordinate the government to the individual, leaving him free to rise to his ultimate potential. We have retreated from that ideal and we need to advance toward it once again.  Therefore, in homage to our past, and welcoming the future with open arms, I stand before you pledging my life, my fortune, and my sacred honor to strive to reach that ideal once again. Thank you.

Recently submitted and rejected...

Sunday, June 15, 2014

The Gold Standard Institute

I'm adding a new site to my blog roll. There's no question in any sane person's mind that fiat currency is a farce and that we are headed for calamity and collapse in money - and that capitalism (freedom) will be blamed - not over a century of government interference. Only a gold standard separated from government manipulation will ensure liberty.
Here are some links to familiarize yourself with genuine currency:

The Gold Standard Institute

Free Money! Then Free the rest of the economy

Gold Wars

Monday, June 02, 2014

Two Articles of Interest by John Robb at his site: Global Guerrillas

I occasionally thumb thru my own link list and I put Mr. Robb's site there when I first started this blog. He has two articles of note on current events that should provide food for thought. Here they are:

Russia and the Crimea

Hackers will fight the next Big War

I don't necessarily agree with everything/most of Mr. Robb's ideas, but they are interesting, to say the least.

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Barbara Walters a journalist? Hardly.

So, Barbara Walters is retiring after some 40 years of successfully posing as a journalist. She is now engaged in a 'farewell tour' of some sort, going on local affiliates and talking to their anchorwomen, uttering empty platitudes.
Truth be told, I can't remember a single interview of hers that had any substance.  In fact, they were    sleep-inducing and dull.

As usual, fellow blogger Scott Holleran sums it up best. Here's a taste, followed by the link to his post.

'Barbara Walters ultimately traffics in trivia, faking sincerity every step of the way, leaving very little if any original reporting or interviewing that’s a first draft of anything let alone history. She is famous for being famous, paving the way more for people like Kim Kardashian, or, for that matter, Megyn Kelly or Rachel Maddow who appear to be passionate about news though in reality huff and puff and add very little to one’s knowledge of what happens or matters. Walters’ lengthy career represents everything shrill, shallow and vapid about today’s barely legal or existent free press.'

Scott Holleran

Wednesday, May 07, 2014

Adding a new Link

I'm pleased to see that Peter Schwartz has a website and that his book, The Tyranny of Need seems to be finished and he's looking for a publisher. See his link in my links section.